Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

International comparisons of He-Ne lasers stabilized with 127I2 at λ = 633 nm (September 1999). Part IX: Comparison of BEV (Austria), CMI (Czech Republic), GUM (Poland), OMH (Hungary), NIPLPR (Romania) and BIPM lasers at λ = 633 nm

M Matus, P Balling, M Smid, J Walczuk, E Bánréti, K Tomanyiczka, G H Popescu, A Chartier and J-M Chartier

Show affiliations


This paper reports the ninth set of results of a series of grouped laser comparisons from national laboratories undertaken by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) at the request of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL), formerly the Consultative Committee for the Definition of the Metre (CCDM), for the periods July 1993 to September 1995 and March 1997 to March 2001. As with the previous eight comparisons, this one is expected to be listed as a key comparison in the context of the ongoing BIPM.L-K10 series.

The results of this comparison, involving six lasers from five European countries and the BIPM, meet the goals set by the CCDM in 1992 and in 1997 and adopted by the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) the same year. The standard uncertainty (1 σ) of the frequency of the He-Ne laser stabilized on the saturated absorption of 127I2 at λ = 633 nm is reduced to a level of 12 kHz (2.5 parts in 1011) when the lasers compared meet the recommended values of the parameters.

The lasers were first compared with the BIPMP3 laser, with all the lasers set to the parameter values normally used in each laboratory; the results then ranged from -97.6 kHz to +30.4 kHz. After checking and correcting when possible the values of all the parameters, the range was reduced to -16.4 kHz to +10.4 kHz. Under the latter conditions, the average frequency difference of the group of lasers, with respect to the BIPM4 laser, was 5.6 kHz with a standard uncertainty (1 σ) of 9.9 kHz. The best relative frequency stabilities, with Allan standard deviations of about 9.7 × 10-12, 6.0 × 10-13 and 2.0 × 10-13, were observed with sampling times of 1 s, 100 s and 1000 s, respectively. The overall best values were 1.0 × 10-13 and 9.0 × 10-14 for sampling times of 3000 s and 12800 s, respectively.


PACS

42.55.Lt Gas lasers including excimer and metal-vapor lasers

06.20.F- Units and standards

42.60.Lh Efficiency, stability, gain, and other operational parameters

06.20.Dk Measurement and error theory

42.60.By Design of specific laser systems

42.50.Gy Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and absorption

Subjects

Instrumentation and measurement

Optics, quantum optics and lasers

Dates

Issue 1 (February 2002)



View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.