Xiaopeng Huang et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 095416 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/9/095416
Xiaopeng Huang1,2,3, Xiulan Huai1, Shiqiang Liang1 and Xinwei Wang3,4
Show affiliationsIn this paper, a systematic study is carried out to investigate the thermal transport in Si/Ge nanocomposites by using molecular dynamics simulation. Emphasis is placed on the effect of nanowire size, heat flux, Si/Ge interface, atomic ratio and defects (voids). The results show that the thermal conductivity of nanowire composites is much lower than that of alloy, which accounts mainly for ZT enhancement and owes a great deal to the effect of interface thermal resistance. A 'reflecting effect' in temperature distribution is observed at the Si/Ge interface, which is largely due to the lack of right quantum temperature correction in the region adjacent to the interface. The thermal conductivity of the nanocomposite is found to have weak dependence on the bulk temperature (200–900 K) and the heat flux in the range (0.5–3.5) × 1010 W m−2. Simulation results reveal that for a constant Si wire dimension, the thermal conductivity of the Si1−xGex nanocomposites increases with x. Our study on the influence of the defects (voids) has the same order of relative thermal conductivity reduction with increasing void density in comparison with the experimental data. Due to the small size (10 nm) of Si nanowires in our nanocomposites, the voids show less effect on thermal conductivity reduction in comparison with the experimental data with 100 nm Si wires.
66.70.-f Nonelectronic thermal conduction and heat-pulse propagation in solids; thermal waves
61.72.Qq Microscopic defects (voids, inclusions, etc.)
65.80.+n Thermal properties of small particles, nanocrystals, nanotubes
Issue 9 (7 May 2009)
Received 25 November 2008, in final form 13 March 2009
Published 16 April 2009
Xiaopeng Huang et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 095416
G C Kim et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 032005
D M Goldie and T J Dines 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 982
Yong Liu and Bang-Gui Liu 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 6791
R Butté et al 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 6328
P Entel et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 865
Kevin Bube et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 1405
D J Mowbray and M S Skolnick 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2059
Toshiaki Hattori et al 2004 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 770
K W D Ledingham et al 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 L79