Ralf Peter Brinkmann 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 194009 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194009
Ralf Peter Brinkmann
Show affiliationsThe boundary sheaths of all plasmas are characterized by a gradual transition from unipolarity (electron depletion, ne
ni) to ambipolarity (quasi-neutrality, ne ≈ ni). Capacitively driven sheaths exhibit a transition which is expanded by the RF modulation and smoothed by thermal effects, i.e. by the finiteness of the electron temperature Te and the Debye length
. Sheath models which neglect thermal effects ('step models') are restricted to strongly modulated high voltage sheaths with VRF
Te/e and fail when this condition is not met. This work presents an improved analysis of the sheath–bulk transition which takes both modulation and thermal effects into account. Based on a previously found asymptotic solution of the Boltzmann–Poisson equation (Brinkmann 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 093393), approximate algebraic (i.e. closed) expressions for the phase-resolved electrical field E and electron density ne in RF sheaths are derived. Under the assumption that the modulation is periodic (not necessarily harmonic) with ωRF
ωpi, also the phase averages of the field
and the electron density
can be expressed in closed form. These results—together referred to as the advanced algebraic approximation (AAA)—make it possible to formulate efficient and accurate models for RF driven boundary sheaths for all ratios of VRF to Te/e. As an example, a harmonically RF modulated, collision-dominated single species sheath is studied. The outcome is compared both with the numerically constructed exact solution and with the well-known step model approach of Lieberman (1989 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 17 338). It is found that the AAA can reproduce the exact numerical solution within a few per cent for all ratios of VRF to Te/e. The step model, in contrast, exhibits strong deviations even for large eVRF/Te and fails completely in the case of weak modulation.
52.80.Pi High-frequency and RF discharges
52.40.Hf Plasma-material interactions; boundary layer effects
Issue 19 (7 October 2009)
Received 12 May 2009, in final form 3 July 2009
Published 18 September 2009
Ralf Peter Brinkmann 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 194009
Satoshi Ohya and Makoto Sakamoto 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 275301
Wei-Chuan Fang et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 485716
D Talbi 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 192 012015
H Oji et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012075
Dawei Zhang et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 475102
I Bársony et al 2009 Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 124009
Suwit Kiravittaya et al 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 046502
Thomas Schäfer and Derek Teaney 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 126001
G Rajshekhar et al 2009 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11 125402