E Çetinórgü et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 5245 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/24/022
E Çetinórgü1,2, S Goldsmith1,3, Z Barkay4 and R L Boxman1,5
Show affiliationsZnO–SnO2 thin films were deposited by filtered vacuum arc deposition system and characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), spectrophotometer and ex situ variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry. According to the XRD analysis the films were amorphous, independent of the deposition conditions. The root-mean-squares (RMS) of surface roughness and the average grain size obtained from the AFM images were 0.2–0.8 nm and 15–20 nm, respectively. Averaged optical transmission was 85%, and the refractive index and extinction coefficient of the films were in the range 2.05–2.28 and 0.001–0.044 at 500 nm wavelength, respectively. The range of the optical band gap of the films was 3.43–3.70 eV, depending on deposition conditions. The lowest resistivity was of the order of 10−2 Ω cm for films deposited on 400 °C heated substrates, while films deposited on substrates at room temperature were non-conducting, and films on 200 °C heated substrates were weakly conducting(~101–2 Ω cm). The resistivity of films decreased with increasing pressure for 200 and 400 °C heated substrates relative to RT deposited films. The effect of deposition conditions on the optical constants was analysed statistically by single and two sided variance analysis, using the analysis code 'Analysis Of Variance' to determine the significance of the differences between sets.
68.55.-a Thin film structure and morphology
68.55.Nq Composition and phase identification
Issue 24 (21 December 2006)
Received 23 May 2006, in final form 19 October 2006
Published 1 December 2006
E Çetinórgü et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 5245
Aleksandr B Shvartsburg 2000 Phys.-Usp. 43 1201
Sabrina Brieger et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 4991
T Hirano et al 2007 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 S879
Song He et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F857
V M M Flyckt et al 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2691
Sadie Baldwin and John Gibbons 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8393
Claus M Schneider and Gerd Schönhense 2002 Rep. Prog. Phys. 65 1785
R. U. Abbasi et al. 2005 ApJ 622 910
Li Jian-Hua et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 116101