J Hendriks et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 274 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/2/007
J Hendriks, S B van der Geer and G J H Brussaard
Show affiliationsWhen switching times are no longer dominated by the plasma formation time, such as for photoconductive switching of high-voltage spark gaps, electrodynamic details of the switching process determine the rise time and pulse shape of the switched pulse. We show that the commonly used zero-dimensional lumped element and one-dimensional transmission line theory are no longer sufficient for optimizing such fast-switching devices, because important electromagnetic-field propagation in three dimensions is neglected. In order to improve the output of the photoconductively switched spark gap, we developed an optimization procedure for spark gap geometries based on full three-dimensional electrodynamic simulations. By monitoring the electromagnetic-field propagation in time, it will be shown that the initial electromagnetic-field disturbance in the gap reflects at the outer conductor and interferes with the initial field. The reflection and interference are essential for the shape of the output signal. We propose the following optimization procedure to improve the output of the photoconductively switched coaxial spark gap. Initially, the reflection and interference can be influenced by reshaping the inner conductor. The outer conductor can be used to fine-tune the system to get an output pulse with a sharp rising edge and no significant oscillations. We also present the optimal spark gap geometry that gives the best output signal at photoconductive switching.
52.75.Kq Plasma switches (e.g., spark gaps)
84.40.Az Waveguides, transmission lines, striplines
41.20.Jb Electromagnetic wave propagation; radiowave propagation
Accelerators, beams and electromagnetism
Issue 2 (21 January 2006)
Received 10 October 2005
Published 6 January 2006
J Hendriks et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 274
J C Legras et al 1999 Metrologia 36 663
J B Griffiths and J Podolský 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 1687
Jérôme Martin et al JHEP03(2005)060
Huang She-Song et al 2008 Chinese Phys. B 17 323
Vl.V. Bobkov et al 2006 Nucl. Fusion 46 S469
Cheng Rong Li and Tsin Chi Yang 1991 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24 48
J A Blanco and J Pisonero 1999 Eur. J. Phys. 20 289
Andrés Mujica and R J Needs 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 L237
Richard H Bayford and Alex Hartov 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30