S J Antony et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 3944 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/38/21/017
S J Antony1, M R Kuhn2, D C Barton3 and R Bland1
Show affiliationsCompaction characteristics of granular materials subjected to axial loading are investigated for both sphere and non-sphere granular assemblies. The computational study is based on the discrete element method (DEM). The compressive stress–strain relation obtained from three-dimensional DEM simulations is compared with that of an idealized two-dimensional plane-strain compression test and physical experiments using a bronze sphere assembly. We observed good agreement between the experimental and three-dimensional DEM simulation results, while two-dimensional simulations significantly underestimate the stiffness of particulate bed, particularly at large strains. This demonstrates that two-dimensional analysis is generally inadequate to model the compaction characteristics of granular systems. We performed a detailed analysis on the force–transmission characteristics of granular materials at microscopic level and present a connection between the directional orientation of force-networks and the invariants of the macroscopic stress tensor: the non-sphere systems were able to build up a strongly anisotropic network of heavily loaded contacts. Several complex phenomena, both geometric and kinematic, that are operative in sphere and non-sphere assemblies due to inter-particle interactions during compression are presented here. It is often assumed that the ratio of invariants of the stress tensor is uniform and constant in uni-axial compression tests. Our results show that the ratio of invariants of the stress tensor is non-uniform and non-constant even when the granular assemblies are subjected to the so-called uni-axial compressive loading, which is in agreement with other recent studies (e.g. Gu et al 2001 Int. J. Plasticity 17 147) performed using the finite element method. The non-homogeneous characteristics that are reported at the particulate scale need to be accounted in considering possible continuum models for the granular systems.
62.20.F- Deformation and plasticity
81.40.Lm Deformation, plasticity, and creep
81.70.Bt Mechanical testing, impact tests, static and dynamic loads
81.05.Rm Porous materials; granular materials
81.40.Jj Elasticity and anelasticity, stress-strain relations
Issue 21 (7 November 2005)
Received 9 August 2005
Published 24 October 2005
S J Antony et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 3944
Michiel R. Hogerheijde et al. 1999 ApJ 513 350
Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr. 1998 ApJ 498 541
T May et al 2003 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 1430
T. K. Sridharan et al. 2002 ApJ 566 931
Kunio Doi 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 R5
G Bergqvist and P Lankinen 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3499
T D Frank 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 3561
Anthony J Guttmann et al 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 3721
Edson D Leonel 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F1077