Sheng-Rui Jian et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2424 doi:10.1088/0022-3727/38/14/019
Sheng-Rui Jian1, Te-Hua Fang2 and Der-San Chuu1,3
Show affiliationsNanopattering using atomic force microscope (AFM) has become an important area of research, for both fundamental research and future nanodevice applications. Local oxidation of p-GaAs(100) surface by using a negatively biased conductive AFM tip is a universal method for this purpose. The dependences of the height, aspect ratio and volume on applied anodization times and voltages during which the anodization voltage is applied were studied. We explore the kinetics and mechanisms of the anodization process and how factors such as the electric field strength and the relative humidity influence its growth rate and the contribution of ionic diffusion. The results revealed that the protruding oxide dot's height, aspect ratio and volume increase during longer anodization time and at larger anodization voltage as well as in higher relative humidity conditions. The high initial growth rate (~300 nm s−1 for 10 V) decreases quickly with decreasing electric field strength and the oxide practically ceases to grow at an order of (2–3) × 107 V cm−1. Auger electron spectroscopy measurements confirm that the modified structures take the form of anodized p-GaAs(100). Also, the contribution of ionic diffusion increases by about 80% at a higher relative humidity. In addition, the nanohardness of the oxide structures was measured with the aid of an AFM-based nanoindentation technique.
68.47.Fg Semiconductor surfaces
62.25.-g Mechanical properties of nanoscale systems
81.16.Rf Nanoscale pattern formation
Issue 14 (21 July 2005)
Received 7 March 2005, in final form 10 May 2005
Published 1 July 2005
Sheng-Rui Jian et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2424
C J Benmore et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S2413
E Prodan 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 4877
C J Wellard et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 5697
Jeong-Young Ji and David Peak 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 3429
Hitomi Kobayashi et al 2007 ApJ 668 L75
Kuninobu Nagaya and André D Bandrauk 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 2829
J W Essam 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 L863
Niranjan Venugopal et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2871
J. Sánchez Almeida 1998 ApJ 497 967