The Formation and Eruption of a Sigmoidal Filament Driven by Rotating Network Magnetic Fields

, , , , and

Published 2021 January 11 © 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Jun Dai et al 2021 ApJ 906 66 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abcaf4

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/906/2/66

Abstract

We present the formation and eruption of a sigmoidal filament driven by rotating network magnetic fields (RNFs) near the center of the solar disk, which was observed by the 1 m aperture New Vacuum Solar Telescope at the Fuxian Solar Observatory on 2018 July 12. Counterclockwise RNFs twist two small-scale filaments at their northeastern foot-point region, giving a rotation of nearly 200° within about 140 minutes. The motion of the RNF has a tendency to accelerate at first and then decelerate obviously, as the average rotation speed increased from 10 to 150° hr−1, and then slowed down to 50° hr−1. Coalescence then occurs between filaments F1 and F2. Meanwhile the fine structures in the southwestern region of the filament was involved in another interaction of coalescence. The subsequent EUV brightening due to plasma heating is observed in the two interaction regions. These interacting structures, including F1, F2 and the fine structures in the southwestern region, eventually evolve into a larger-scale sigmoidal filament twisted in the same direction as the RNFs gave. The twist of the sigmoidal filament has exceeded 4π and the filament finally erupted. The motion of the sigmoidal filament remains uniform until a nearby jet collides, causing the filament to erupt faster. These results provide evidence that RNF plays an important role in the formation and eruption of the sigmoidal filament. The phenomena also suggests that the kink instability is the trigger mechanism for the filament eruption.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

In recent years, some new observations have found that small-scale vortex flows in the photosphere could drive the corresponding rotating magnetic structure in the corona. Classically, the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) cyclones discovered by Zhang & Liu (2011) and magnetic tornadoes reported by Wedemeyer-Böhm et al. (2012) are all driven by the underlying photospheric vortex flows or rotating network magnetic fields (RNFs), since the EUV and magnetic tornadoes are found to be rooted in the network magnetic fields.

In fact, similar theories were proposed earlier: the motion of the photosphere may cause the pre-existing magnetic field of the corona to recombine and form a filament (van Ballegooijen & Martens 1989; Gaizauskas et al. 1997). Recent high-resolution observations also hold that the rotating magnetic fields are closely associated with the formation and eruption of sigmoidal filaments (Yan et al. 2012; Török et al. 2013; Chen & Ruan 2014). By studying the positions of the barbs of the filaments, Lin et al. (2005) concluded that the quiescent filaments are basically connected with the network magnetic fields below. Furthermore, Yang et al. (2015) directly observed the formation and eruption of a quiescent circular filament driven by an RNF, which suggested that the RNFs will influence the evolution of the filaments in quiet regions.

Sigmoids are the manifestation of highly sheared magnetic structures, which present the S-shaped or inverse-shaped structures in the lower corona (Rust & Kumar 1996). According to statistical research (Hudson et al. 1998; Canfield et al. 1999, 2007), such sigmoidal structures are basically unstable and will erupt eventually. A qualitative model for sigmoid eruption was proposed by Moore & Labonte (1980) and further elaborated on by Moore et al. (2001), they suggested that a magnetic explosion is unleashed internally in the middle of the sigmoid. The prediction of Moore's model in observations includes brightenings in multiwave bands (Yurchyshyn et al. 2006), hot moving plasma (Joshi et al. 2014), and bright plasma outflows (Chen et al. 2014, 2016) in the merging region of two filaments.

Chae (2000) reported that filaments sometimes appear as mixtures of threads based on high-resolution observations, and presented that we can discern the crossing of the overlying and underlying threads to determine the twist of a filament. It was found that the sigmoids almost have a twist less than 2π (Leamon et al. 2003). The twist (Φ) is the rotating angle of the magnetic field lines through a flux rope, and continuous twisting around the flux rope inevitably leads to kink instability, which is a possible mechanism for solar filament eruption. Török & Kliem (2003) found that the critical threshold for the twist lies in the range of 2.5π < Φc  < 2.75π by simulating a flux tube driven by photospheric vortex motions. Considering the effect of overlying magnetic field in the process of simulation, Török & Kliem (2005) further found that the decrease of the overlying magnetic field with height will decide whether the instability leads to a coronal mass ejection (CME). If the magnetic field above the flux rope is strong enough, it would prevent the eruption of the flux rope, resulting in a failed eruption of filaments as reported by Ji et al. (2003).

On 2018 July 12, the formation and eruption of a small-scale sigmoidal filament in a quiet region near the center of the solar disk was recorded by the New Vacuum Solar Telescope (NVST). In this paper, we focus on the rotation of the RNFs in the northeastern filament foot-point region and its role in the formation and twisting of a sigmoidal filament. They provide us a rare opportunity to study the relationship between RNFs and sigmoidal filaments. The observations and results are separately presented in Sections 2 and 3. Our summary and discussion are presented in Section 4.

2. Data and Observations

NVST (Liu et al. 2014) is a 1 m aperture ground-based vacuum solar telescope at the Fuxian Solar Observatory, which is operated by Yunnan Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Currently, it provides Level-1 high-resolution images of chromosphere and photosphere at the Hα line (sometimes including off-band) and TiO 7058 Å. Quick-look movies can be downloaded from the following website: http://fso.ynao.ac.cn. On 2018 July 12, there was no active region on the solar disk. NVST pointed to the center of the solar disk, targeting a large quiescent filament. The active filaments analyzed in this paper are located northeast from the large quiescent filament. In the study, we employ NVST data obtained in the Hα 6562.8 Å line from 05:23 UT to 10:16 UT. The Hα images have a spatial sampling and time cadence of 0137 pixel−1 and 12 s, respectively.

For other wavelengths, we use EUV observations at 171 Å and 304 Å from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA; Lemen et al. 2012) on board the Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO; Pesnell et al. 2012). The emission of AIA 171 Å and 304 Å are from Fe ix and He ii, with the characteristic temperatures of 6.3 × 105 K and 5.0 × 104 K respectively. The large quiescent filament was recognizable at the two wavelength, which is very helpful for a believable coalignment between EUV and Hα images. Since the pixel resolutions of the two kinds of images have been fixed, the only thing left for the coalignment is to make the filament cospatial. For level 1.5 AIA images, their spatial sampling is fixed at 06 pixel−1. Visual inspections were made during the coalignment, and we estimate the accuracy to be within 1''.

To analyze the nature of the RNF, we use network magnetic elements at the foot-point region of the active filaments observed by line-of-sight magnetograms of Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI; Schou et al. 2012) also on board SDO. The 05 pixel−1 and 45 s cadence of the magnetograms are sufficient to resolve the two network magnetic elements with the size of ∼5'' and the temporal behavior of the rotation.

3. Results

Near the center of the solar disk, an unstable sigmoid filament was formed in the Hα 6562.8 Å channel and the AIA 171 Å channel around 09:05 UT on 2018 July 12. It is denoted by white dotted lines in Figures 1((a)–(b)). We notice that the filament is located in a region with network magnetic fields in quiet Sun. The corresponding photospheric magnetic fields are given in Figure 1(c). The filament connects the southwestern positive and northeastern negative polarity network magnetic fields separately. No magnetic polarity inversion line can be clearly discerned along the filament.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. General information of the filament. (a) A NVST Hα image. (b) An AIA 171 Å image. (c) An HMI LOS magnetogram with the magnetic field strengths in the range of −15 and 15 G. The white and blue dotted lines ((a)–(c)) outline the filament F in all the panels. The red rectangle in (c) shows the field of view (FOV) of Figure 2.

Standard image High-resolution image

At about 05:30 UT, the network magnetic field in the northeastern foot-point region of the filament starts to rotate slowly. In Figure 2(a), a white line is used to connect the centers of two concentrations of network magnetic field, and a red vertical line is drawn as a reference line. The angle α between the white line and the red line is used to record the rotation process of the RNFs. In Figure 2, we use the green and blue arrows to mark the negative network magnetic fields N1 and N2, respectively, and the arrows are made to be parallel to the line connecting N1 and N2, i.e., the white line in Figure 2(a). It can be seen from Figure 2 that the relative position and size of the negative RNFs do not change significantly, and the relatively independent topological structure of the negative RNFs is almost maintained from 05:30 UT to 08:00 UT. After this time period, as shown in Figure 2(h), N1 and N2 finally merged becoming one single negative network magnetic field.

Figure 2. Evolution of magnetic fields at the northeastern endpoint of the filament. (a)–(h) HMI LOS magnetograms. The white line in (a) indicates the connection between the centers of the two negative network magnetic fields, N1 and N2, and the red line in (a) marks 0° or 180°. α in (a) is the angle between the white and red lines. The green and blue arrows in (a)–(g) point to the negative network magnetic fields N1 and N2. An animation of this figure is available. The animation begins at 2018 July 12 05:29:08 UT and ends the same day at 08:25:23 UT. The realtime duration of the animation is 24 s.

(An animation of this figure is available.)

Video Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 3 shows the temporal evolution of the rotation angle α of the RNFs in the northeastern foot-point region of the filament. From 05:30 UT to 07:50 UT, the RNF rotates counterclockwise by nearly 200°. From Figure 3, we find that the rotation has an obvious process of acceleration, keeping nearby uniform, and deceleration. From 05:30 UT to 06:15 UT, the average angular velocity of rotation, V1, is 10° hr−1. In a process of acceleration, from 06:30 UT to 07:15 UT, the average angular velocity of rotation, V2, becomes 150° hr−1, and then the rotation starts to slow down, from 07:25 UT to 07:50 UT, with an the average rotation velocity, V3, of 50° hr−1. At about 08:00 UT, RNFs stop their rotation, then the negative network magnetic fields N1 and N2 begin to merge (see the animation of Figure 2), so the angle α cannot be measured any more. We use second-order piecewise fitting to get the blue curve value in Figure 3, which is a good approach to fit the variation of the rotation angles with time.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Temporal behavior for the rotation of the magnetic fields at the northeastern endpoint of the filament. The black squares correspond to the rotating angle α (the average angle of several measurements) in Figures 2. The red bars mark the errors (the difference between the maximum or minimum value measured and the average value). The blue line represents a fit to the observed values and shows its evolution trend. The red arrows represent the rotations in three different time periods, and the rotating speeds are marked by the numbers.

Standard image High-resolution image

Starting around 07:30 UT, two small filaments F1 and F2 are observed in the Hα 6562.8 Å band. We find that, at the moment when the filaments F1 and F2 are first observed, no obvious S-shaped structures can be detected. In the case of the rotary drive of RNFs, from around 07:50 UT, filaments F1 and F2 begin to bend into S-shaped structures (Figures 4(a)–(c)). In Figures 4(a)–(c), we show three snapshots of the structures of F1 and F2, and outline them with white dotted lines, the black contours represent the RNFs at the negative polarity foot-point of the filament F1 and F2. These prove that F1 and F2 are rooted in the RNFs. After about 10 minutes, by around 08:00 UT, the filaments F1 and F2 are fully developed into S-shaped structures. From about 08:00 UT, almost the same time that RNFs stop the rotation, coalescence between the two filaments F1 and F2 takes place, the position of the interaction was marked by the blue arrows in Figures 4(d)–(e). Significant brightening is observed at the same location in AIA 171 Å (designated as B1 in Figure 4(f)). At the same time, in the region R2 enclosed by the blue dotted line in Figures 4(c)–(e), coalescence also occurs between many small-scale fine structures in the southwestern region, and significant brightening is also observed in the same region in AIA 171 Å enclosed by the pink dotted line in Figure 4(f).

Figure 4. Formation of the sigmoidal filament. All panels except panel (f) give NVST Hα images. Panel (f) gives an AIA 171 Å image showing the brightenings during the coalescense. The white dotted lines in ((a)–(c)) outline the initial sigmoid structure of the filament F1 and F2 at different times, respectively. The black and red contours in ((a)–(c)) represent the negative and positive polarity magnetic fields surrounding filaments F1 and F2 with magnetic field strengths of −15 and 15 G, respectively. The small yellow arrows in panels (c)–(d) mark the fine structures also involved in the coalescence. The blue arrows in panels (d)–(e) mark the coalescence interaction region R1 between F1 and F2. The blue dotted circles in panels (c)–(e) indicate the coalescence interaction region R2 between F2 and fine structures. The pink arrow in panel (f) marks a brightening region B1. The pink dotted circle in panel (f) marks a brightening region B2. The white arrows, 1–4, in panel (g) mark the crossing positions of two dark threads in the filament F. The white dotted lines in panels (h)–(i) outline the filament F. An animation of this figure is available. The left panel is of the NVST Hα sequence while the right panel is the AIA 171 Å series. The animation begins at 2018 July 12 07:29:33 UT and ends the same day at 08:25:21 UT. The realtime duration of the animation is 14 s.

(An animation of this figure is available.)

Video Standard image High-resolution image

Around 08:25 UT, a series of multiple coalescence occurred and resulted in a larger sigmoidal filament. In the process of the formation, the filament becomes unstable and shows a dynamic behavior. According to the identification method with observation (Chae 2000), we estimate the twist of the filament. As shown in Figure 4(g), two dark threads cross each other four times, which are pointed out by four white arrows, indicating that the twist of the filament has exceeded 4π, which has exceeded the critical value of the kink instability triggering mechanism (Török & Kliem 2003). At this point, the filament becomes unstable, beginning to show a dynamic behavior. The twisting direction is the same as the direction of RNFs. After about 15 minutes of slow evolution, at around 08:40 UT, the northeastern foot-point of the filament shows a vortex-like structure, and the spine of the filament F shows an inverse sigmoidal shape. (See the animation of Figure 4). The vortex-like structure and inverse s-shaped structure as shown in Figure 4(h) are well developed at 08:56 UT.

The motion of the filament remains uniform until about 09:03 UT, a jet collides with the moving filament F. At the interface, brightening is identified, see Figures 5(b)–(c), which lasts for about three minutes until 09:12 UT. We make a time slice of the Hα 6562.8 Å images, and the spacetime diagram is shown in Figure 5(e). This indicates that the filament first moves slowly with a rough uniform speed across the field of view of  3 km s−1, and then quickly appears to erupt with a larger mean projected speed of  12 km s−1. No associated CME is detected during the filament eruption. The filament eruption is thus a failed one.

Figure 5. Panels (a)–(d) give the eruption process of the filament as observed with NVST Hα images. (e) A time slice of NVST Hα images along the red line AB as displayed in panel (c). The white dotted line in panel (e) outlines the eruption of the filament F, and the erupting speeds are denoted by the numbers in panel (e). An animation of this figure is available. The animation begins at 2018 July 12 08:26:52 UT and ends the same day at 09:21:34 UT. The realtime duration of the animation is 36 s.

(An animation of this figure is available.)

Video Standard image High-resolution image

4. Summary and Discussion

In this paper, we investigated the formation and eruption of a sigmoidal filament observed by NVST on 2018 July 12. The formation and eruption of the filament are associated with the magnetic rotating network fields (RNFs). By analyzing the evolutions of the RNFs in the northeastern foot-point region of the filaments, we notice that the RNFs result in the bending of two small-scale filaments, F1 and F2. Due to the persistent twisting of RNFs, the coalescence between the two filaments and also the fine structures in the southwestern region occurred, forming a larger sigmoidal filament. At the same time, the twist of the sigmoidal filament increased to at least 4π and became unstable. What characterizes the instability is the subsequent slow movement of the filament, which keeps nearly uniform until accelerated by a nearby jet. According to the kink instability condition, we suggest that the filament eruption studied in the paper was triggered by kink instability.

S-shaped filaments caused by RNFs have been reported by Yang et al. (2015), who found that RNFs drove the formation of a small circular filament in the quiet Sun. Similarly, sunspot rotation is closely associated with the formation of the sigmoidal filaments (Yan et al. 2012; Török et al. 2013; Chen & Ruan 2014). Our results provide further observational evidence that rotating motion on various spatial scales in the photosphere plays an important role in the formation of the quiescent filaments.

In this event, the RNFs rotated by 200° within about 140 minutes, which was less than the twist value 4π. We speculate that the multiple coalescence between two filaments F1 and F2 and the fine structures in the southwestern region directly lead to an increase in the twist of the filament. Corresponding brightening in the EUV band is identified at the regions where the coalescence takes place, in agreement with the observations previously reported, in which the brightening plasma structures in multiwave bands (Yurchyshyn et al. 2006; Chen et al. 2014, 2016; Joshi et al. 2014) in the merging region of two filaments are observed. In our study, RNFs and the coalescence twist the quiescent filament together. The joint twisting is rarely reported.

Török & Kliem (2003) confirmed that kink instability is one of the triggering mechanisms for solar filament eruptions, which was later supported by some observational studies (Srivastava et al. 2010; Kumar et al. 2012; Yan et al. 2014; Duchlev et al. 2019). However, the twist of the filament is not easy to measure. In this event, based on the high-resolution images, we clearly distinguish the crossing threads structure in the spine of the filament. The twist of the filament observed in this paper has reached 4π, exceeding the critical value of the kink instability obtained by previous authors (Török & Kliem 2003).

The observation and concept of a failed filament eruption was first proposed in Ji et al. (2003). Török & Kliem (2005) obtained the same conclusion through numerical simulation: strong overlying magnetic field lines will inhibit the lifting of the filament and lead to a failed eruption. Later similar failed eruptions was reported (Alexander et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2009; Kuridze et al. 2013; Xue et al. 2016). The filament eruption in this work should be failed since no associated CME is detected. In addition, Shen et al. (2011) considered that the amount of energy gained during the eruption is also an important determinant of whether or not the eruption is full. The filament eruption reported in this work is actually a gentle one. We think that the structural scale of the filament is too small; therefore, a strong enough overlying magnetic field and insufficient energy obtained during the eruption together lead to the failed eruption.

The authors thank the referee for constructive comments and suggestions. The Hα data used in this paper were obtained with the New Vacuum Solar Telescope in the Fuxian Solar Observatory of the Yunnan Astronomical Observatory, CAS. SDO is a mission of NASA's Living With a Star Program. AIA and HMI data are courtesy of the NASA/SDO science teams. The authors are indebted to the SDO and NVST teams for providing the data. H.J. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (11790302). L.L. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (11673034, 12073042 and 11533008). J.Z. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (11790304), and Key Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH050).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/abcaf4