Jessie L. Christiansen et al. 2010 ApJ 710 97 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/97
Jessie L. Christiansen1, Sarah Ballard1, David Charbonneau1, Nikku Madhusudhan2, Sara Seager2, Matthew J. Holman1, Dennis D. Wellnitz3, Drake Deming3, Michael F. A'Hearn3 and the EPOXI Team
Show affiliationsThe highly irradiated transiting exoplanet, HAT-P-7b, currently provides one of the best opportunities for studying planetary emission in the optical and infrared wavelengths. We observe six near-consecutive secondary eclipses of HAT-P-7b at optical wavelengths with the EPOXI spacecraft. We place an upper limit on the relative eclipse depth of 0.055% (95% confidence). We also analyze Spitzer observations of the same target in the infrared, obtaining secondary eclipse depths of 0.098% ± 0.017%, 0.159% ± 0.022%, 0.245% ± 0.031%, and 0.225% ± 0.052% in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 μm IRAC bands, respectively. We combine these measurements with the recently published Kepler secondary eclipse measurement and generate atmospheric models for the dayside of the planet that are consistent with both the optical and infrared measurements. The data are best fit by models with a temperature inversion, as expected from the high incident flux. The models predict a low optical albedo of
0.13, with subsolar abundances of Na, K, TiO, and VO. We also find that the best-fitting models predict that 10% of the absorbed stellar flux is redistributed to the nightside of the planet, which is qualitatively consistent with the inefficient day-night redistribution apparent in the Kepler phase curve. Models without thermal inversions fit the data only at the 1.25σ level, and also require an overabundance of methane, which is not expected in the very hot atmosphere of HAT-P-7b. We also analyze the eight transits of HAT-P-7b present in the EPOXI data set and improve the constraints on the system parameters, finding a period of P = 2.2047308 ± 0.0000025 days, a stellar radius of R
= 1.824 ± 0.089 R ☉, a planetary radius of Rp = 1.342 ± 0.068 R Jup, and an inclination of i = 85.7+3.5 –2.2 deg.
Issue 1 (2010 February 10)
Received 2009 September 16, accepted for publication 2009 November 12
Published 2010 January 15
Jessie L. Christiansen et al. 2010 ApJ 710 97
Gennady Shvets and Yaroslav A Urzhumov 2006 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8 S122
2001 Phys. Educ. 36 508
Y F Yuan et al 2005 Nanotechnology 16 803
Radu Dascaliuc 2003 Nonlinearity 16 1945
Mikkel Heise Kofoed 2006 Phys. Educ. 41 502
C E Ruiz-Díaz et al 1999 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14 222
Kimberly A Dick et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 1344
Renaud Leplaideur 2005 Nonlinearity 18 2847
Clifford J Nolan and Margaret Cheney 2002 Inverse Problems 18 221