Nicholas A. Bond et al. 2009 ApJ 705 639 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/639
Nicholas A. Bond1, Eric Gawiser1, Caryl Gronwall2, Robin Ciardullo2, Martin Altmann3 and Kevin Schawinski4,5
Show affiliationsWe present a rest-frame ultraviolet analysis of ~120 z ~ 3.1 Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South. Using Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images taken as part of the Galaxy Evolution From Morphology and SEDS (GEMS) survey, Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS), and Hubble Ultradeep Field surveys, we analyze the sizes of LAEs, as well as the spatial distribution of their components, which are defined as distinct clumps of UV-continuum emission. We set an upper limit of ~1 kpc (~0
1) on the rms offset between the centroids of the continuum and Lyα emission. The SFRs of LAE components inferred from the rest-frame ultraviolet continuum range from ~0.1 M ☉ yr–1 to ~5 M ☉ yr–1. A subsample of LAEs with coverage in multiple surveys (at different imaging depths) suggests that one needs a signal-to-noise ratio, S/N
30, in order to make a robust estimate of the half-light radius of an LAE system. The majority of LAEs have observed half-light radii
2 kpc, and LAE components typically have observed half-light radii
1.5 kpc (
0
20). Although only ~50% of the detected LAE components are resolved at GOODS depth, the brightest (V
26.3) are all resolved in both GOODS and GEMS. Since we find little evidence for a correlation between the rest-UV sizes and magnitudes of LAEs, the majority should be resolved in a deeper survey at the ~0
05 angular resolution of the HST. Most of the multi-component LAEs identified in shallow frames become connected in deeper images, suggesting that the majority of the rest-UV "clumps" are individual star-forming regions within a single system.
cosmology: observations; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: structure
Issue 1 (2009 November 1)
Received 2009 July 13, accepted for publication 2009 September 9
Published 2009 October 14
Nicholas A. Bond et al. 2009 ApJ 705 639
David S. Spiegel et al. 2009 ApJ 699 1487
Mercedes López-Morales and Sara Seager 2007 ApJ 667 L191
P Blair Blakie and Matthew J Davis 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 2043
P B Blakie et al 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 3273
T Padmanabhan and T P Singh 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4419
G I Gomero 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4775
A M Mukhamedzhanov et al 2005 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 S1413
D A Trifonov 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 11873
B Mota et al 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4837