Wei Liu et al. 2009 ApJ 698 632 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/632
Wei Liu1,3,4, Tong-Jiang Wang1,2, Brian R. Dennis1 and Gordon D. Holman1
Show affiliationsWe present an X-ray imaging and spectroscopic study of a partially occulted (N16W93) C7.7 flare on 2003 April 24 observed by Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopy Imager that accompanied a prominence eruption observed by Transition Region and Coronal Explorer. (1) The activation and rise of the prominence occurs during the preheating phase of the flare. The initial X-ray emission appears as a single coronal source at one leg of the prominence and it then splits into a double source. Such a source splitting happens three times, each coinciding with an increased X-ray flux and plasma temperature, suggestive of fast reconnection in a localized current sheet and an enhanced energy-release rate. In the late stage of this phase, the prominence displays a helical structure. These observations are consistent with the tether-cutting and/or kink-instability model for triggering solar eruptions. (2) The eruption of the prominence takes place during the flare impulsive phase. Since then, there appear signatures predicted by the classical model of two-ribbon flares occurring in a vertical current sheet trailing an eruption. These signatures include an extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) cusp and current-sheet-like feature (or ridge) above it. There is also X-ray emission along the EUV ridge both below and above the cusp, which in both regions appears closer to the cusp at higher energies in the thermal regime (
20 keV). This trend is reversed in the nonthermal regime. (3) Spectral analysis indicates thermal X-rays from all sources throughout the flare, while during the impulsive phase there is additional nonthermal emission which primarily comes from the coronal source below the cusp. This source also has a lower temperature (T = 20 ± 1 vs. 25 ± 1 MK), a higher emission measure (EM = (3.3 ± 0.4) vs. (1.2 ± 0.4) × 1047 cm–3), and a harder nonthermal spectrum (electron power-law index δ = 5.4 ± 0.4 vs. 8 ± 1) than the upper sources.
Sun: flares; Sun: prominences; Sun: UV radiation; Sun: X-rays, gamma rays
Issue 1 (2009 June 10)
Received 2009 February 10, accepted for publication 2009 April 1
Published 2009 May 21
Wei Liu et al. 2009 ApJ 698 632
J W Durkee Jr et al 1998 Phys. Med. Biol. 43 2949
K Thornton and Mark Asta 2005 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13 R53
M C Fischer et al 2001 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3 279
S M Bidoki et al 2007 J. Micromech. Microeng. 17 967
T K Ko et al 2006 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 21 1064
Raghu N Kacker and James F Lawrence 2007 Metrologia 44 117
Keith Promislow and J Nathan Kutz 2000 Nonlinearity 13 675
Simon D M White 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 883
A. Belmonte and J.-M. Flesselles 1995 Europhys. Lett. 32 267