A. L. Wilmot-Smith et al. 2009 ApJ 696 1339 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1339
A. L. Wilmot-Smith1, G. Hornig and D. I. Pontin
Show affiliationsThe braiding of the solar coronal magnetic field via photospheric motions—with subsequent relaxation and magnetic reconnection—is one of the most widely debated ideas of solar physics. We readdress the theory in light of developments in three-dimensional magnetic reconnection theory. It is known that the integrated parallel electric field along field lines is the key quantity determining the rate of reconnection, in contrast with the two-dimensional case where the electric field itself is the important quantity. We demonstrate that this difference becomes crucial for sufficiently complex magnetic field structures. A numerical method is used to relax a braided magnetic field toward an ideal force-free equilibrium; the field is found to remain smooth throughout the relaxation, with only large-scale current structures. However, a highly filamentary integrated parallel current structure with extremely short length-scales is found in the field, with the associated gradients intensifying during the relaxation process. An analytical model is developed to show that, in a coronal situation, the length scales associated with the integrated parallel current structures will rapidly decrease with increasing complexity, or degree of braiding, of the magnetic field. Analysis shows the decrease in these length scales will, for any finite resistivity, eventually become inconsistent with the stability of the coronal field. Thus the inevitable consequence of the magnetic braiding process is a loss of equilibrium of the magnetic field, probably via magnetic reconnection events.
Issue 2 (2009 May 10)
Received 2008 October 9, accepted for publication 2009 February 26
Published 2009 April 23
A. L. Wilmot-Smith et al. 2009 ApJ 696 1339
George G. Pavlov et al 2001 ApJ 559 L131
S Kulin et al 2001 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3 353
H W Weijers et al 2004 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17 636
Andrew Baranovski et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 78 012020
Yu Ts Oganessian et al 1992 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 18 393
R J Baxter 1980 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13 L61
Ann-Marie Pendrill 2005 Phys. Educ. 40 517
Ann-Marie Pendrill and Henrik Rödjegård 2005 Phys. Educ. 40 522
Ann-Marie Pendrill and Gary Williams 2005 Phys. Educ. 40 527