C. Faure et al. 2009 ApJ 695 1233 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1233
C. Faure1,2, J.-P. Kneib3, S. Hilbert4,5, R. Massey6, G. Covone7,8, A. Finoguenov9,10, A. Leauthaud11, J. E. Taylor12, S. Pires13, N. Scoville14 and Anton M. Koekemoer15
Show affiliationsWe study the correlation between the locations of galaxy-galaxy strong-lensing candidates and tracers of large-scale structure from both weak lensing (WL) or X-ray emission. The Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS) is a unique data set, combining deep, high resolution and contiguous imaging in which strong lenses have been discovered, plus unparalleled multiwavelength coverage. To help interpret the COSMOS data, we have also produced mock COSMOS strong- and WL observations, based on ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation. In agreement with the simulations, we find that strongly lensed images with the largest angular separations are found in the densest regions of the COSMOS field. This is explained by a prevalence among the lens population in dense environments of elliptical galaxies with high total-to-stellar mass ratios, which can deflect light through larger angles. However, we also find that the overall fraction of elliptical galaxies with strong gravitational lensing is independent of the local mass density; this observation is not true of the simulations, which predict an increasing fraction of strong lenses in dense environments. The discrepancy may be a real effect, but could also be explained by various limitations of our analysis. For example, our visual search of strong lens systems could be incomplete and suffer from selection bias; the luminosity function of elliptical galaxies may differ between our real and simulated data; or the simplifying assumptions and approximations used in our lensing simulations may be inadequate. Work is therefore ongoing. Automated searches for strong lens systems will be particularly important in better constraining the selection function.
galaxies: abundances; gravitational lensing; large-scale structure of universe
Issue 2 (2009 April 20)
Received 2008 October 27, accepted for publication 2009 January 20
Published 2009 April 7
C. Faure et al. 2009 ApJ 695 1233
A Botman et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 372001
Thomas P. Robitaille and Barbara A. Whitney 2010 ApJ 710 L11
A E Farrell and A R Brandt 2006 Environ. Res. Lett. 1 014004
Deirdre Shoemaker et al 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3729
Rafael de la Llave et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F427
W Taweepreda et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012150
T Ogino et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 100 052020
Louis-Paul Faure et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 170 012023
J Dalessio et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 172 012076