Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Cluster Structure in Cosmological Simulations. I. Correlation to Observables, Mass Estimates, and Evolution

FREE ISSUE

Tesla E. Jeltema1,2, Eric J. Hallman3,4, Jack O. Burns4 and Patrick M. Motl5

Show affiliations


We use Enzo, a hybrid Eulerian adaptive mesh refinement/N-body code including nongravitational heating and cooling, to explore the morphology of the X-ray gas in clusters of galaxies and its evolution in current-generation cosmological simulations. We employ and compare two observationally motivated structure measures: power ratios and centroid shift. Overall, the structure of our simulated clusters compares remarkably well to low-redshift observations, although some differences remain that may point to incomplete gas physics. We find no dependence on cluster structure in the mass-observable scaling relations, TX-M and YX-M, when using the true cluster masses. However, estimates of the total mass based on the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium, as assumed in observational studies, are systematically low. We show that the hydrostatic mass bias strongly correlates with cluster structure and, more weakly, with cluster mass. When the hydrostatic masses are used, the mass-observable scaling relations and gas mass fractions depend significantly on cluster morphology, and the true relations are not recovered even if the most relaxed clusters are used. We show that cluster structure, via the power ratios, can be used to effectively correct the hydrostatic mass estimates and mass scaling relations, suggesting that we can calibrate for this systematic effect in cosmological studies. Similar to observational studies, we find that cluster structure, particularly centroid shift, evolves with redshift. This evolution is mild but will lead to additional errors at high redshift. Projection along the line of sight leads to significant uncertainty in the structure of individual clusters: less than 50% of clusters which appear relaxed in projection based on our structure measures are truly relaxed.

Subject headings

galaxies: clusters: general; hydrodynamics; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical; X-rays: galaxies: clusters


Dates

Issue 1 (2008 July 1)

Received 2007 August 9, accepted for publication 2008 January 22



  1. Cluster Structure in Cosmological Simulations. I. Correlation to Observables, Mass Estimates, and Evolution

    Tesla E. Jeltema et al. 2008 ApJ 681 167

  2. Verification of the optimal backscatter for an aSi electronic portal imaging device

    Joseph A Moore and Jeffrey V Siebers 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2341

  3. Series expansions of the percolation probability for directed square and honeycomb lattices

    I Jensen and A J Guttmann 1995 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 4813

  4. An accelerating universe and dynamical compactification of extra dimensions

    F Darabi 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 3385

  5. Signature change, mixed problems and numerical relativity

    J M Stewart 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 4983

  6. Metrics with distributional curvature

    David Garfinkle 1999 Class. Quantum Grav. 16 4101

  7. Experimental Study on Transitional Flow in a Circular Microtube

    Hao Peng-Fei et al 2006 Chinese Phys. Lett. 23 2815

  8. A generalization of the Chebyshev polynomials

    Yang Chen and Nigel Lawrence 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 4651

  9. On multi-graviton and multi-gravitino gauge theories

    Stephen C Anco 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 6445

  10. Conformal null infinity does not exist for radiating solutions in odd spacetime dimensions

    Stefan Hollands and Robert M Wald 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 5139

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.