Nathaniel R. Butler et al. 2007 ApJ 671 656 doi:10.1086/522492
Nathaniel R. Butler1,2, Daniel Kocevski2, Joshua S. Bloom2,3 and Jason L. Curtis2
Show affiliationsWe calculate durations and spectral parameters for 218 Swift bursts detected by the BAT instrument between and including gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) 041220 and 070509, including 77 events with measured redshifts. Incorporating prior knowledge into the spectral fits, we are able to measure the characteristic νFν spectral peak energy Epk, obs and the isotropic equivalent energy Eiso (1-104 keV) for all events. This complete and rather extensive catalog, analyzed with a unified methodology, allows us to address the persistence and origin of high-energy correlations suggested in pre-Swift observations. We find that the Epk, obs-Eiso correlation is present in the Swift sample; however, the best-fit power-law relation is inconsistent with the best-fit pre-Swift relation at >5 σ significance. It has a factor
2 larger intrinsic scatter, after accounting for large errors on Epk, obs. A large fraction of the Swift events are hard and subluminous relative to (and inconsistent with) the pre-Swift relation, in agreement with indications from BATSE GRBs without redshift. Moreover, we determine an experimental threshold for the BAT detector and show how the Epk, obs-Eiso correlation arises artificially due to partial correlation with the threshold. We show that pre-Swift correlations found by Amati et al., Yonetoku et al., and Firmani et al., and independently by others are likely unrelated to the physical properties of GRBs and are likely useless for tests of cosmology. Also, an explanation for these correlations in terms of a detector threshold provides a natural and quantitative explanation for why short-duration GRBs and events at low redshift tend to be outliers to the correlations.
Issue 1 (2007 December 10)
Received 2007 June 8, accepted for publication 2007 August 10
Nathaniel R. Butler et al. 2007 ApJ 671 656
Massimo Giovannini 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 L73
C Figl et al 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 3369
S Walker-Samuel et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 3593
M A Riley et al 2005 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 S1735
F Haas and J Goedert 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 6837
Robert G Jones et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 4059
S. Komossa and David Merritt 2008 ApJ 689 L89
R. Ferrer i Cancho and D. Lusseau 2006 Europhys. Lett. 74 1095
Michael J W Hall 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 7799