W. M. Wood-Vasey et al. 2007 ApJ 666 694 doi:10.1086/518642
W. M. Wood-Vasey1, G. Miknaitis2, C. W. Stubbs1,3, S. Jha4,5, A. G. Riess6,7, P. M. Garnavich8, R. P. Kirshner1, C. Aguilera9, A. C. Becker10, J. W. Blackman11, S. Blondin1, P. Challis1, A. Clocchiatti12, A. Conley13, R. Covarrubias10, T. M. Davis14, A. V. Filippenko4, R. J. Foley4, A. Garg1,3, M. Hicken1,3, K. Krisciunas8,15, B. Leibundgut16, W. Li4, T. Matheson17, A. Miceli10, G. Narayan1,3, G. Pignata12, J. L. Prieto18, A. Rest9, M. E. Salvo11, B. P. Schmidt11, R. C. Smith9, J. Sollerman14,19, J. Spyromilio16, J. L. Tonry20, N. B. Suntzeff9,15 and A. Zenteno9
Show affiliationsWe present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, w = P/(ρc2), using 60 SNe Ia from the ESSENCE supernova survey. We derive a set of constraints on the nature of the dark energy assuming a flat universe. By including constraints on (ΩM, w) from baryon acoustic oscillations, we obtain a value for a static equation-of-state parameter w = -1.05
(stat 1 σ) ± 0.13 (sys) and ΩM = 0.274
(stat 1 σ) with a best-fit χ2/dof of 0.96. These results are consistent with those reported by the Supernova Legacy Survey from the first year of a similar program measuring supernova distances and redshifts. We evaluate sources of systematic error that afflict supernova observations and present Monte Carlo simulations that explore these effects. Currently, the largest systematic with the potential to affect our measurements is the treatment of extinction due to dust in the supernova host galaxies. Combining our set of ESSENCE SNe Ia with the first-results Supernova Legacy Survey SNe Ia, we obtain a joint constraint of w = -1.07
(stat 1 σ) ± 0.13 (sys), ΩM = 0.267
(stat 1 σ) with a best-fit χ2/dof of 0.91. The current global SN Ia data alone rule out empty (ΩM = 0), matter-only ΩM = 0.3, and ΩM = 1 universes at >4.5 σ. The current SN Ia data are fully consistent with a cosmological constant.
cosmological parameters; cosmology: observations; supernovae: general
Issue 2 (2007 September 10)
Received 2006 November 21, accepted for publication 2007 April 2
W. M. Wood-Vasey et al. 2007 ApJ 666 694
David W Dreisigmeyer and Peter M Young 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8297
Lior Shamir and Robert J. Nemiroff 2005 The Astronomical Journal 129 539
David Bowdley 2003 Phys. Educ. 38 406
A P Gibson et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 R1
Alejandro Clocchiatti et al. 2006 ApJ 642 1
Fabien Silly et al 2004 New J. Phys. 6 16
Takaaki Kajita 2004 New J. Phys. 6 194
E Havard et al 2008 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 23 035001
N. Madhusudhan and Joshua N. Winn 2009 ApJ 693 784