Bradley E. Schaefer 2007 ApJ 660 16 doi:10.1086/511742
Bradley E. Schaefer1
Show affiliationsOne of the few ways to measure the properties of dark energy is to extend the Hubble diagram (HD) to higher redshifts with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). GRBs have at least five properties (their spectral lag, variability, spectral peak photon energy, time of the jet break, and the minimum rise time) that have correlations to the luminosity of varying quality. In this paper I construct a GRB HD with 69 GRBs over a redshift range from 0.17 to >6, with half the bursts having a redshift larger than 1.7. This paper uses over 3.6 times as many GRBs and 12.7 times as many luminosity indicators as any previous GRB HD work. For the gravitational lensing and Malmquist biases, I find that the biases are small, with an average of 0.03 mag and an rms scatter of 0.14 mag in the distance modulus. The GRB HD is well behaved and nicely delineates the shape of the HD. The reduced χ2 for the fit to the concordance model is 1.05, and the rms scatter about the concordance model is 0.65 mag. This accuracy is just a factor of 2.0 times that gotten for the same measure from all the big supernova surveys. I fit the GRB HD to a variety of models, including where the dark energy has its equation of state parameter varying as w(z) = w0 + waz/(1 + z). I find that the concordance model is consistent with the data, that is, the dark energy can be described well as a cosmological constant that does not change with time.
cosmological parameters; cosmology: observations; dark matter; gamma rays: bursts
Issue 1 (2007 May 1)
Received 2006 September 3, accepted for publication 2006 December 8
Bradley E. Schaefer 2007 ApJ 660 16
Renaud Belmont and Michel Tagger 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 54 147
Ricardo Weder 2004 Inverse Problems 20 893
Petru Lunca-Popa et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 1248
M D Todd et al 2001 Smart Mater. Struct. 10 1000
S O Reza Moheimani et al 2003 Smart Mater. Struct. 12 49
A Grimpe et al 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 135
C K Lo et al 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 1315
Prakash Gupta et al 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 1137
S Reucroft et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 60 187