J. J. Fortney et al. 2007 ApJ 659 1661 doi:10.1086/512120
J. J. Fortney1,2,3, M. S. Marley1 and J. W. Barnes4
Show affiliationsTo aid in the physical interpretation of planetary radii constrained through observations of transiting planets, or eventually direct detections, we compute model radii of pure hydrogen-helium, water, rock, and iron planets, along with various mixtures. Masses ranging from 0.01 Earth masses to 10 Jupiter masses at orbital distances of 0.02-10 AU are considered. For hydrogen-helium rich planets, our models are the first to couple planetary evolution to stellar irradiation over a wide range of orbital separations (0.02-10 AU) through a nongray radiative-convective equilibrium atmosphere model. Stellar irradiation retards the contraction of giant planets, but its effect is not a simple function of the irradiation level: a planet at 1 AU contracts as slowly as a planet at 0.1 AU. We confirm the assertion of Guillot that very old giant planets under modest stellar irradiation (like that received by Jupiter and Saturn) develop isothermal atmospheric radiative zones once the planet's intrinsic flux drops to a small fraction of the incident flux. For hydrogen-helium planets, we consider cores up to 90% of the total planet mass, comparable to those of Uranus and Neptune. If "hot Neptunes" have maintained their original masses and are not remnants of more massive planets, radii of ~0.30-0.45 RJ are expected. Water planets are ~40%-50% larger than rocky planets, independent of mass. Finally, we provide tables of planetary radii at various ages and compositions, and for ice-rock-iron planets we fit our results to analytic functions, which will allow for quick composition estimates, given masses and radii, or mass estimates, given only planetary radii. These results will assist in the interpretation of observations for both the current transiting planet surveys as well as upcoming space missions, including COROT and Kepler.
Issue 2 (2007 April 20)
Received 2006 November 3, accepted for publication 2006 December 20
An Erratum for this article has been published in 2007 ApJ 668 1267
J. J. Fortney et al. 2007 ApJ 659 1661
O. Richard et al. 2002 ApJ 580 1100
J. E. Chambers 2009 ApJ 705 1206
L A Gizzi et al 2007 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49 B211
Carlos H. Veiga et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 125 2714
G. C. Anupama and G. C. Dewangan 2000 The Astronomical Journal 119 1359
N Lu et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045006
C A Müller et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 7807
J. A. Ouellette and C. J. Pritchet 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 2539
F. Casanova et al 2008 EPL 81 26003