Bing Zhang et al. 2007 ApJ 655 989 doi:10.1086/510110
Bing Zhang1, Enwei Liang1,2, Kim L. Page3, Dirk Grupe4, Bin-Bin Zhang1,5, Scott D. Barthelmy6, David N. Burrows4, Sergio Campana6, Guido Chincarini7,8, Neil Gehrels6, Shiho Kobayashi9, Peter Mészáros4,10, Alberto Moretti7, John A. Nousek4, Paul T. O'Brien3, Julian P. Osborne3, Peter W. A. Roming4, Takanori Sakamoto6, Patricia Schady4 and Richard Willingale3
Show affiliationsWe systematically analyze the prompt emission and the early afterglow data of a sample of 31 GRBs detected by Swift before 2005 September and estimate the GRB radiative efficiency. BAT's narrow band inhibits a precise determination of the GRB spectral parameters, and we have developed a method to estimate these parameters with the hardness ratio information. The shallow decay component commonly existing in early X-ray afterglows, if interpreted as continuous energy injection in the external shock, suggests that the GRB efficiencies previously derived from the late-time X-ray data were not reliable. We calculate two radiative efficiencies using the afterglow kinetic energy EK derived at the putative deceleration time (tdec) and at the break time (tb), when the energy injection phase ends, respectively. At tb XRFs appear to be less efficient than normal GRBs. However, when we analyze the data at tdec, XRFs are found to be as efficient as GRBs. Short GRBs have similar radiative efficiencies to long GRBs despite of their different progenitors. Twenty-two bursts in the sample are identified to have the afterglow cooling frequency below the X-ray band. Assuming
e = 0.1, we find ηγ(tb) usually <10% and ηγ(tdec) varying from a few percent to >90%. Nine GRBs in the sample have the afterglow cooling frequency above the X-ray band for a very long time. This suggests a very small
B and/or a very low ambient density n.
gamma rays: bursts; methods: statistical; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; shock waves
Issue 2 (2007 February 1)
Received 2006 March 8, accepted for publication 2006 October 5
Bing Zhang et al. 2007 ApJ 655 989
Arthur M. Wolfe et al. 2003 ApJ 593 235
D. E. Harris et al. 2002 ApJ 580 110
Jacob Lund Fisker et al. 2008 ApJS 174 261
P E Falloon et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 5477
Hsiao-Wen Chen et al. 2007 ApJ 668 384
Yoshiaki Hagiwara et al 2001 ApJ 560 L37
Thomas G. Barnes III et al. 2005 ApJ 631 572
M Sahimi 1987 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 L1293
R J Senden et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 3301