Joseph F. Hennawi et al. 2007 ApJ 654 714 doi:10.1086/497362
Joseph F. Hennawi1,2,3, Neal Dalal1,4, Paul Bode3 and Jeremiah P. Ostriker3
Show affiliationsWe present a detailed investigation into which properties of CDM halos make them effective strong gravitational lenses. Strong-lensing cross sections of 878 clusters from an N-body simulation are measured by ray-tracing through 13,594 unique projections. We measure concentrations, axis ratios, orientations, and the substructure of each cluster, and compare the lensing-weighted distribution of each quantity to that of the cluster population as a whole. The concentrations of lensing clusters are on average 34% larger than the typical cluster in the universe. Despite this bias, the anomalously high concentrations (c > 14) recently measured by several groups appear to be inconsistent with the concentration distribution in our simulations, which predict that <2% of lensing clusters should have concentrations this high. No correlation is found between lensing cross section and substructure. We introduce several types of simplified dark matter halos and use them to isolate which properties of CDM clusters make them effective lenses. The abundance of giant arcs is primarily determined by the mass distribution within an average overdensity of ~10,000. A multiple-lens-plane ray-tracing algorithm is used to show that projections of large-scale structure increase the giant arc abundance modestly, by <7%. We revisit the claimed excess of giant arcs behind high redshift clusters in the RCS survey and find that the number of high-redshift (z > 0.6) lenses is in good agreement with ΛCDM, although our simulations predict more low-redshift (z < 0.6) lenses than observed.
cosmology: theory; dark matter; galaxies: clusters: general; gravitational lensing; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical
Issue 2 (2007 January 10)
Received 2005 June 7, accepted for publication 2006 September 13
Joseph F. Hennawi et al. 2007 ApJ 654 714
Peter D. Edmonds et al. 2002 ApJ 579 741
J. R. Brownstein and J. W. Moffat 2006 ApJ 636 721
Igor Drozdovsky et al. 2005 The Astronomical Journal 130 1324
Nathan Leigh et al. 2007 ApJ 661 210
Jianghui Ji et al. 2007 ApJ 657 1092
Paulo C. C. Freire et al. 2005 ApJ 621 959
G. Fossati et al. 2008 ApJ 677 906
G. Torres et al 2007 ApJ 666 L121
Bradley E. Schaefer 2007 ApJ 660 16