Joseph F. Hennawi et al. 2007 ApJ 654 714 doi:10.1086/497362
Joseph F. Hennawi1,2,3, Neal Dalal1,4, Paul Bode3 and Jeremiah P. Ostriker3
Show affiliationsWe present a detailed investigation into which properties of CDM halos make them effective strong gravitational lenses. Strong-lensing cross sections of 878 clusters from an N-body simulation are measured by ray-tracing through 13,594 unique projections. We measure concentrations, axis ratios, orientations, and the substructure of each cluster, and compare the lensing-weighted distribution of each quantity to that of the cluster population as a whole. The concentrations of lensing clusters are on average 34% larger than the typical cluster in the universe. Despite this bias, the anomalously high concentrations (c > 14) recently measured by several groups appear to be inconsistent with the concentration distribution in our simulations, which predict that <2% of lensing clusters should have concentrations this high. No correlation is found between lensing cross section and substructure. We introduce several types of simplified dark matter halos and use them to isolate which properties of CDM clusters make them effective lenses. The abundance of giant arcs is primarily determined by the mass distribution within an average overdensity of ~10,000. A multiple-lens-plane ray-tracing algorithm is used to show that projections of large-scale structure increase the giant arc abundance modestly, by <7%. We revisit the claimed excess of giant arcs behind high redshift clusters in the RCS survey and find that the number of high-redshift (z > 0.6) lenses is in good agreement with ΛCDM, although our simulations predict more low-redshift (z < 0.6) lenses than observed.
cosmology: theory; dark matter; galaxies: clusters: general; gravitational lensing; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical
Issue 2 (2007 January 10)
Received 2005 June 7, accepted for publication 2006 September 13
Joseph F. Hennawi et al. 2007 ApJ 654 714
J Jiménez-Mier et al 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 L693
Sophia A. Khan et al. 2009 ApJ 706 319
Gernot Schmid and Richard Überbacher 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 4711
Wu Yi-Qun et al 2002 Chinese Phys. Lett. 19 1700
R G Vishwakarma 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 4747
E Ben-Naim and P L Krapivsky 2005 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 S4249
A J M Medved et al 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3111
Alexander Volya et al 1999 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25 2049
Z Haba 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 9295