D. Burgess 2006 ApJ 653 316 doi:10.1086/508805
D. Burgess1
Show affiliationsEnergetic electrons are a common feature of interplanetary shocks and planetary bow shocks, and they are invoked as a key component of models of nonthermal radio emission, such as solar radio bursts. A simulation study is carried out of electron acceleration for high Mach number, quasi-perpendicular shocks, typical of the shocks in the solar wind. Two-dimensional self-consistent hybrid shock simulations provide the electric and magnetic fields in which test particle electrons are followed. A range of different shock types, shock normal angles, and injection energies are studied. When the Mach number is low, or the simulation configuration suppresses fluctuations along the magnetic field direction, the results agree with theory assuming magnetic moment conserving reflection (or fast Fermi acceleration), with electron energy gains of a factor only 2-3. For high Mach numbers, with a realistic simulation configuration, the shock front has a dynamic rippled character. The corresponding electron energization is radically different: energy spectra display (1) considerably higher maximum energies than fast Fermi acceleration; (2) a plateau or shallow sloped region at intermediate energies 2-5 times the injection energy; (3) power-law falloff with increasing energy, for both upstream and downstream particles, with a slope decreasing as the shock normal angle approaches perpendicular; (4) sustained flux levels over a broader region of shock normal angle than for adiabatic reflection. All these features are in good qualitative agreement with observations, and show that dynamic structure in the shock surface at ion scales produces effective scattering and can be responsible for making high Mach number shocks effective sites for electron acceleration.
Issue 1 (2006 December 10)
Received 2006 July 21, accepted for publication 2006 August 29
D. Burgess 2006 ApJ 653 316
Roland M. Crocker et al. 2005 ApJ 622 892
Jianghui Ji et al. 2005 ApJ 631 1191
Jordi Barr et al. 2005 The Astronomical Journal 130 445
Adam Muzzin et al. 2007 ApJ 663 150
Michael R. Blanton and Sam Roweis 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 734
B. G. Piner et al. 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 2357
John M. Blondin et al. 2003 ApJ 584 971
J. L. Highberger et al. 2001 ApJ 562 790
G. A. Drukier et al. 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 1041