Marcin Sawicki and David Thompson 2006 ApJ 642 653 doi:10.1086/500999
Marcin Sawicki1,2,3 and David Thompson2
Show affiliationsWe use very deep UnG
I multifield imaging obtained at the Keck telescope to study the evolution of the rest-frame 1700 Å galaxy luminosity function as the universe doubles its age from z ~ 4 to ~2. We use exactly the same filters and color-color selection as those used by the Steidel team but probe significantly fainter limits, well below L*. The depth of our imaging allows us to constrain the faint end of the luminosity function, reaching M1700 ~ -18.5 at z ~ 3 (equivalent to ~1 M
yr-1), accounting for both N1/2 uncertainty in the number of galaxies and cosmic variance. We carefully examine many potential sources of systematic bias in our LF measurements before drawing the following conclusions. We find that the luminosity function of Lyman break galaxies evolves with time and that this evolution is differential with luminosity. The result is best constrained between the epochs at z ~ 4 and ~3, where we find that the number density of sub-L* galaxies increases with time by at least a factor of 2.3 (11 σ statistical confidence); while the faint end of the LF evolves, the bright end appears to remain virtually unchanged, indicating that there may be differential, luminosity-dependent evolution (98.5% statistical probability). Potential systematic biases restrict our ability to draw strong conclusions about continued evolution of the luminosity function to lower redshifts, z ~ 2.2 and ~1.7, but, nevertheless, it appears certain that the number density of z ~ 2.2 galaxies at all luminosities we studied, -22 > M1700 > -18, is at least as high as that of their counterparts at z ~ 3. While it is not yet clear what mechanism underlies the observed evolution, the fact that this evolution is differential with luminosity opens up new avenues of improving our understanding of how galaxies form and evolve at high redshift.
galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: starburst
Issue 2 (2006 May 10)
Received 2005 April 25, accepted for publication 2005 December 14
Marcin Sawicki and David Thompson 2006 ApJ 642 653
O Akhavan et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 225305
Kirill A Kazakov 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 7125
J Bünemann 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 5327
Ghi R Shin and Berndt Müller 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 2485
Takaaki Tanaka et al. 2008 ApJ 685 988
J. Kane et al. 2000 ApJ 528 989
Prahalad M Parthangal et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3786
Kausik S Das et al 2009 Nonlinearity 22 2981
S. Sahayanathan and R. Misra 2005 ApJ 628 611