Gilles Henri and Ludovic Saugé 2006 ApJ 640 185 doi:10.1086/500039
Gilles Henri1 and Ludovic Saugé2
Show affiliationsThere is growing evidence that the estimations of the beaming Doppler factor in TeV BL Lac objects based on the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) models are in strong disagreement with those deduced from the unification models between blazars and radio galaxies. When corrected from extragalactic absorption by the diffuse infrared background (DIrB), the SSC one-zone models require a very high Lorentz factor (around 50) to avoid strong γ-γ absorption. However, the statistics on beamed versus unbeamed objects, as well as the luminosity contrast, favors a much lower Lorentz factor, on the order of 3. In this paper, we show that for the special case of Markarian 501, the need for a very high Lorentz factor is unavoidable for all one-zone models in which all photons are assumed to be produced at the same location at the same time. Models assuming a double structure with two different beaming patterns can partially solve the problem of luminosity contrast, but we point out that they are inconsistent with the statistics on the number of detected TeV sources. The only way to solve the issue is to consider inhomogeneous models, in which low-energy and high-energy photons are not produced at the same place, allowing for much smaller Lorentz factors. This approach implies that the jet is stratified, but also that the particle energy distribution is close to a monoenergetic one and that pair production is likely to be significant. The implications for relativistic jet physics and the particle acceleration mechanism are discussed.
BL Lacertae objects: general; galaxies: active; galaxies: jets; gamma rays: theory; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal
Issue 1 (2006 March 20)
Received 2005 July 13, accepted for publication 2005 November 18
Gilles Henri and Ludovic Saugé 2006 ApJ 640 185
Chu A Kwang-Hua 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 L711
Sheng-Rui Jian et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2424
C J Benmore et al 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S2413
E Prodan 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 4877
C J Wellard et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 5697
Jeong-Young Ji and David Peak 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 3429
Hitomi Kobayashi et al 2007 ApJ 668 L75
Kuninobu Nagaya and André D Bandrauk 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 2829
J W Essam 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 L863