Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Expansion and Collapse in the Cosmic Web* **

FREE

Michael Rauch1, George D. Becker2, Matteo Viel3, Wallace L. W. Sargent2, Alain Smette4,5, Robert A. Simcoe6, Thomas A. Barlow2 and Martin G. Haehnelt3

Show affiliations


We study the kinematics of the gaseous cosmic web at high redshift using Lyα forest absorption in multiple QSO sight lines. Observations of the projected velocity shifts between Lyα absorbers common to the lines of sight to a gravitationally lensed QSO and three more widely separated QSO pairs are used to directly measure the expansion of the cosmic web in units of the Hubble velocity, as a function of redshift and spatial scale. The lines of sight used span a redshift range from about 2 to 4.5 and represent transverse scales from the subkiloparsec range to about 300 himg1.gif physical kpc. Using a simple analytic model and a cosmological hydrodynamic simulation, we constrain the underlying three-dimensional distribution of expansion velocities from the observed line-of-sight distribution of velocity shear across the plane of the sky. The shape of the shear distribution and its width (14.9 km s-1 rms for a physical transverse separation of 61 himg1.gif kpc at z = 2, 30.0 km s-1 for 261 himg1.gif kpc at z = 3.6) are found to be in good agreement with the IGM undergoing large-scale motions dominated by the Hubble flow, making this one of the most direct observations possible of the expansion of the universe. However, modeling the Lyα clouds with a simple "expanding pancake" model, the average expansion velocity of the gaseous structures causing the Lyα forest in the lower redshift (z ~ 2) smaller separation (61 kpc) sample appears about 20% lower than the local Hubble expansion velocity.

In order to understand the observed velocity distribution further we investigated the statistical distribution of expansion velocities in cosmological Lyα forest simulations. The mean expansion velocity in the (z ~ 2, separation ~ 60 kpc) simulation is indeed somewhat smaller than the Hubble velocity, as found in the real data. We interpret this finding as tentative evidence for some Lyα forest clouds breaking away from the Hubble flow and undergoing the early stages of gravitational collapse. However, the distribution of velocities is highly skewed, and the majority of Lyα forest clouds at all redshifts from 2 to 3.8 expand with super-Hubble velocities, typically about 5%-20% faster than the Hubble flow. This behavior is explained if most Lyα forest clouds in the column density range typically detectable are expanding filaments that stretch and drain into more massive nodes. The significant difference seen in the velocity distributions between the high- and low-redshift samples may conceivably reflect actual peculiar deceleration, the differences in spatial scale, or our selecting higher densities at lower redshift for a given detection threshold for Lyα forest lines.

We also investigate the alternative possibility that the velocity structure of the general Lyα forest could have an entirely different, local origin, as expected if the Lyα forest were produced or at least significantly modified by galactic feedback, e.g., winds from star-forming galaxies at high redshift. However, we find no evidence that the observed distribution of velocity shear is significantly influenced by processes other than Hubble expansion and gravitational instability. To avoid overly disturbing the IGM, galactic winds may be old and/or limp by the time we observe them in the Lyα forest, or they may occupy only an insignificant volume fraction of the IGM. We briefly discuss the observational evidence usually presented in favor of an IGM afflicted by high-redshift extragalactic superwinds and find much of it ambiguous. During the hierarchical buildup of structure, galaxies are expected to spill parts of their interstellar medium and to heat and stir the IGM in ways that make it hard to disentangle this gravitational process from the effects of winds.


Footnote
*  Part of the observations were made at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership between the California Institute of Technology and the University of California; it was made possible by the generous support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.
Footnote
**  Based partly on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, Paranal, Chile (ESO programs 67.A-0371[A] and 69.A-0555[A]).
Subject headings

cosmology: observations; gravitational lensing; intergalactic medium; quasars: absorption lines; quasars: individual (Q1422+2309, Q1424+2255, Q2345+007A, Q2345+007B, RX J0911+0551, SDSSp J143951.60–003429.2, SDSSp J143952.58–003359.2)


Dates

Issue 1 (2005 October 10)

Received 2005 April 2, accepted for publication 2005 May 26



  1. Expansion and Collapse in the Cosmic Web

    Michael Rauch et al. 2005 ApJ 632 58

  2. Renormalised perturbation theory of normal systems

    C J Lambert and W E Hagston 1981 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14 1533

  3. A Temperley–Lieb quantum chain with two- and three-site interactions

    Y Ikhlef et al 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 292002

  4. Dopant Effects on Defects in GaN Films Grown by Metal-Organic Chemical Vapour Deposition

    Lu Min et al 2003 Chinese Phys. Lett. 20 1552

  5. Larmor precession of polarised neutrons as a probe of the magnetisation of ultrathin epitaxial films

    J A C Bland et al 1989 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1 4399

  6. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in homogeneous phantoms

    Elinore Wieslander and Tommy Knöös 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1533

  7. Methods for primary standardization of activity

    Stefaan Pommé 2007 Metrologia 44 S17

  8. dBB quantization of a torus-like black hole

    Chang-Jun Gao and You-Gen Shen 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 119

  9. Low kinetic energy photoelectron diffractions for C 1s and O 1s electrons of free CO molecules in the EXAFS region

    Jun-ichi Adachi et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012049

  10. How photon astronomy affects searches for continuous gravitational waves

    Benjamin J Owen 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 204014

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.