Pablo Fosalba et al. 2005 ApJ 632 29 doi:10.1086/432906
Pablo Fosalba1,2, Jun Pan1,3 and István Szapudi1
Show affiliationsWe perform detailed comparison of the semianalytic halo model predictions with measurements in numerical simulations of the two- and three-point correlation functions, as well as power spectrum and bispectrum. We discuss the accuracy and self-consistency of the halo model description of gravitational clustering in the nonlinear regime and constrain halo model parameters. We exploit the recently proposed multipole expansion of three-point statistics that expresses rotation invariance in the most natural way. This not only offers technical advantages by reducing the integrals required for the halo model predictions, but also amounts to a convenient way of compressing the information contained in the three-point correlation functions (3PCFs). We find that, with an appropriate choice of the halo boundary and mass function cutoff, halo model predictions are in good agreement with the bispectrum measured in numerical simulations. However, the halo model predicts less than the observed configuration dependence of the 3PCF on ~megaparsec scales. This effect is mainly due to quadrupole moment deficit, possibly related to the assumption of spherical halo geometry. Our analysis shows that using its harmonic decomposition, the full configuration dependence of the 3PCF in the nonlinear regime can be compressed into just a few numbers, the lowest multipoles. Moreover, these multipoles are closely related to the highest signal-to-noise eigenmodes of the 3PCF. Therefore this estimator may simplify future analyses aimed at constraining cosmological and halo model parameters from observational data.
cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical; methods: statistical
Issue 1 (2005 October 10)
Received 2005 April 18, accepted for publication 2005 June 17
Pablo Fosalba et al. 2005 ApJ 632 29
A B Duval and A I McIntosh 1980 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13 1617
J C Wyngaard and J L Lumley 1967 J. Sci. Instrum. 44 363
Zhenhui Kang et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 55
Rei Inoue 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 1013
and
alloys
Esther Belin-Ferré et al 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 6213
V Vizcaino et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 053002
Y Kawasaki et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 191 012001
Julian Hauss et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 095018
Maurizio Benfatto and Stefano Della Longa 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012031