L. D. Bradley et al. 2004 ApJ 603 463 doi:10.1086/381680
L. D. Bradley1, M. E. Kaiser1 and W. A. Baan2
Show affiliationsWe have investigated the physical conditions in the narrow-line region (NLR) of M51 by using long-slit spectra obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph aboard the Hubble Space Telescope and 3.6 cm radio continuum observations obtained with the Very Large Array. Emission-line diagnostics were employed for nine NLR clouds, which extend 2
5 (102 pc) from the nucleus, to examine the electron density, temperature, and ionization state of the NLR gas. The emission-line ratios are consistent with those typically found in Seyfert nuclei and indicate that within the inner near-nuclear region (r
1'') the ionization decreases with increasing radius. Upper limits to the [O III] electron temperature (Te
11,000 K) for the inner NLR clouds indicate that photoionization is the dominant ionization mechanism close to the nucleus. The emission-line fluxes for most of the NLR clouds can be reproduced reasonably well by simple photoionization models using a central power-law continuum source and supersolar nitrogen abundances. Shock+precursor models, however, provide a better fit to the observed fluxes of an NLR cloud ~2
5 south of the nucleus that is identified with the extranuclear cloud. The large [O III] electron temperature of this cloud (Te = 24,000 K) further suggests the presence of shocks. This cloud is straddled by two radio knots and lies near the location where a weak radio jet, ~2
5 (102 pc) in extent, connects the near-nuclear radio emission with a diffuse lobe structure spanning ~4'' (163 pc). It is plausible that this cloud represents the location where the radio jet impinges on the disk ISM.
galaxies: active; galaxies: individual (M51); galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: Seyfert
Issue 2 (2004 March 10)
Received 2003 September 30, accepted for publication 2003 November 25
L. D. Bradley et al. 2004 ApJ 603 463
Barry J Cox et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 13197
Andrea Kunder et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 631
Anil Shaji 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 11285
M. J. Henrich et al 2006 Europhys. Lett. 76 1057
Carl M Bender and Stefan Boettcher 1998 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 L273
A W Sandvik 1992 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25 3667
R T Aulwes et al 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 8237
K. M. Dasyra et al. 2006 ApJ 638 745
K J Falconer 1988 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21 L737