Andy G. Gibb et al. 2004 ApJ 603 198 doi:10.1086/381309
Andy G. Gibb1, John S. Richer2, Claire J. Chandler3 and Chris J. Davis4
Show affiliationsWe have observed the SiO J = 5 → 4 line toward a sample of 25 low-luminosity (L* < 103 L
) protostellar outflow systems. The line was detected toward seven of the 25 sources, a detection rate of 28%. The majority (5 of 7) of sources detected were of Class 0 status. We detected a higher fraction of Class 0 sources compared with the Class I and II sources, although given the small numbers involved the significance of this result should be regarded as tentative. Most of the detected sources showed emission either at or close to the central position, coincident with the protostar. In four cases (HH 211, HH 25MMS, V380 Ori NE, and HH 212) emission was also detected at positions away from the center, and it was stronger than that observed at the center position. SiO abundances of 10-8 to 8 × 10-7 are derived from LTE analysis. For two sources we have additional transitions, which we use to conduct statistical equilibrium modeling to estimate the gas density in the SiO-emitting regions. For HH 25MMS these results suggest that the SiO emission arises in a higher density region than the methanol previously observed. We find that the most likely explanation for the preferential detection of SiO emission toward Class 0 sources is the greater density of those environments, reinforced by higher shock velocities. We conclude that while not all Class 0 sources exhibit SiO emission, SiO emission is a good signpost for the presence of Class 0 sources.
ISM: Herbig-Haro objects; ISM: jets and outflows; ISM: molecules; radio lines: ISM; stars: formation
Issue 1 (2004 March 1)
Received 2003 May 22, accepted for publication 2003 November 12
Andy G. Gibb et al. 2004 ApJ 603 198
E G Kalnins et al 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 4705
Paolo Aschieri et al 2005 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 3511
R Seviour et al 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 L621
R Guerrero et al 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 1761
Arthur M. Wolfe et al. 2003 ApJ 593 215
Lam H Yu and Douglas Natelson 2004 Nanotechnology 15 S517
A Z Faranesh and T E Yankeelov 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 2617
C X Cui et al 2005 Nanotechnology 16 2661
B. J. Wargelin et al. 2004 ApJ 607 596