A. Ptak et al. 2003 ApJ 592 782 doi:10.1086/375766
A. Ptak1, T. Heckman1, N. A. Levenson2, K. Weaver3,4 and D. Strickland1,5
Show affiliationsWe present initial results from a Chandra survey of a complete sample of the eight nearest (z ≤ 0.04) ultraluminous IR galaxies (ULIRGs) and also include the IR-luminous galaxy NGC 6240 for comparison. In this paper we use the hard X-rays (2-8 keV) to search for the possible presence of an obscured active galactic nucleus (AGN). In every case, a hard X-ray source is detected in the nuclear region. If we divide the sample according to the optical/IR spectroscopic classification (starburst vs. AGN), we find that the five "starburst" ULIRGs have hard X-ray luminosities about an order of magnitude smaller than the three "AGN" ULIRGs. NGC 6240 has an anomalously high hard X-ray luminosity compared to the starburst ULIRGs. The Fe-Kα line is convincingly detected in only two ULIRGs. The weakness of the Fe-K emission in these ULIRGs generally suggests that the hard X-ray spectrum is not dominated by reflection from high-NH neutral material. The hard X-ray continuum flux ranges from a few × 10-3 to a few × 10-5 of the far-IR flux, similar to values in pure starbursts and several orders of magnitude smaller than in Compton-thin AGNs. The upper limits on the ratio of the Fe-Kα-to-far-IR flux are below the values measured in Compton-thick type 2 Seyfert galaxies. While very large column densities of molecular gas are observed in the nuclei of these galaxies, we find no evidence that the observed X-ray sources are obscured by Compton-thick material. Thus, our new hard X-ray data do not provide direct evidence that powerful "buried quasars" dominate the overall energetics of most ULIRGs.
galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: starburst; X-rays: galaxies
Issue 2 (2003 August 1)
Received 2002 October 1, accepted for publication 2003 April 7
A. Ptak et al. 2003 ApJ 592 782
E Minguzzi et al 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 9591
Ross I Berbeco et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3655
Murthy S. Gudipati et al. 2003 ApJ 583 514
Jun-Chen Su et al 1999 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25 2325
Raymond R Raylman et al 2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 6371
Yeong E Kim and Alexander L Zubarev 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 L243
B Cheal et al 2003 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29 2479
Bozhidar Z Iliev 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 4887
J R Stewart et al 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 L321