J. A. Eisner and S. R. Kulkarni 2001 ApJ 550 871 doi:10.1086/319801
J. A. Eisner1 and S. R. Kulkarni1
Show affiliationsThe technique of measuring radial velocity (RV) has produced spectacular discoveries of short-period Jovian mass objects around a fraction (5%-10%) of nearby G stars. Although we expect Jovian planets to be located in long-period orbits of decades or longer (if our solar system is any guide), detecting such planets with the RV technique is difficult because of the smaller velocity amplitudes and the limited temporal baseline (5-10 yr) of current searches relative to the expected orbital periods. This paper develops an analytical understanding of the sensitivity of the RV technique in the regime in which the orbital period is larger than the total baseline of the survey. Moreover, we focus on the importance of the orbital phase in this "long-period" regime and develop a least-squares detection technique based on the amplitude and phase of the fitted signal. To illustrate the benefits of this amplitude-phase analysis, we compare it with existing techniques. Previous authors, such as Nelson and Angel in 1998, have explored the sensitivity of an amplitude-only analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. Others have supplemented this by using the slope of the linear component of the fitted sinusoid in addition (e.g., Walker and colleagues in 1995 and Cumming and colleagues in 1999). In this paper, we illustrate the benefits of the least-squares technique over periodogram analysis and demonstrate the superiority of an amplitude-phase technique over previous analyses.
methods: data analysis; planetary systems; techniques: radial velocities
Issue 2 (2001 April 1)
Received 2000 August 20, accepted for publication 2000 November 22
J. A. Eisner and S. R. Kulkarni 2001 ApJ 550 871
R. L. Akeson et al. 2005 ApJ 622 440
Joan R. Najita et al. 2009 ApJ 691 738
E. Buchlin and M. Velli 2007 ApJ 662 701
B. F. Lane et al. 2007 ApJ 658 520
J. A. Eisner et al. 2003 ApJ 588 360
Domenico D'Alessandro 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 9721
Sébastien Galtier and Eric Buchlin 2007 ApJ 656 560
J. A. Eisner and S. R. Kulkarni 2002 ApJ 574 426
Valerii V Ryazanov et al 2004 Phys.-Usp. 47 732