J. R. Bond et al. 2000 ApJ 533 19 doi:10.1086/308625
J. R. Bond1, A. H. Jaffe2 and L. Knox1,3
Show affiliationsPowerful constraints on theories can already be inferred from existing CMB anisotropy data. But performing an exact analysis of available data is a complicated task and may become prohibitively so for upcoming experiments with
104 pixels. We present a method for approximating the likelihood that takes power spectrum constraints, e.g., "band-powers," as inputs. We identify a bias which results if one approximates the probability distribution of the band-power errors as Gaussian—as is the usual practice. This bias can be eliminated by using specific approximations to the non-Gaussian form for the distribution specified by three parameters (the maximum likelihood or mode, curvature or variance, and a third quantity). We advocate the calculation of this third quantity by experimenters, to be presented along with the maximum-likelihood band-power and variance. We use this non-Gaussian form to estimate the power spectrum of the CMB in 11 bands from multipole moment
= 2 (the quadrupole) to
= 3000 from all published band-power data. We investigate the robustness of our power spectrum estimate to changes in these approximations as well as to selective editing of the data.
cosmic microwave background; cosmology: miscellaneous; methods: data analysis; methods: statistical
Issue 1 (2000 April 10)
Received 1998 August 25, accepted for publication 1999 November 16
J. R. Bond et al. 2000 ApJ 533 19
Jingzhi Yan et al. 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 1478
F. Aharonian et al 2007 ApJ 664 L71
M. Sullivan et al. 2004 ApJS 155 1
R. T. Zavala et al. 2007 ApJ 655 1046
Tesla E. Jeltema et al. 2008 ApJ 681 167
N. D'Amico et al 2002 ApJ 570 L89
J. T. A. de Jong et al. 2008 ApJ 680 1112
Joseph F. Hennawi et al. 2007 ApJ 654 714
Peter D. Edmonds et al. 2002 ApJ 579 741