S. Perlmutter et al. 1999 ApJ 517 565 doi:10.1086/307221
S. Perlmutter1,12, G. Aldering1, G. Goldhaber1,12, R. A. Knop1, P. Nugent1, P. G. Castro1,13, S. Deustua1, S. Fabbro1,14, A. Goobar1,15, D. E. Groom1, I. M. Hook1,16, A. G. Kim1,12,17, M. Y. Kim1, J. C. Lee1,18, N. J. Nunes1,13, R. Pain1,14, C. R. Pennypacker1,19, R. Quimby1, C. Lidman2, R. S. Ellis3, M. Irwin3, R. G. McMahon3, P. Ruiz-Lapuente4, N. Walton5, B. Schaefer6, B. J. Boyle7, A. V. Filippenko8, T. Matheson8, A. S. Fruchter9, N. Panagia9,20, H. J. M. Newberg10, W. J. Couch11 and The Supernova Cosmology Project
Show affiliationsWe report measurements of the mass density, ΩM, and cosmological-constant energy density, ΩΛ, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these supernovae, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fitted jointly with a set of supernovae from the Calán/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to yield values for the cosmological parameters. All supernova peak magnitudes are standardized using a SN Ia light-curve width-luminosity relation. The measurement yields a joint probability distribution of the cosmological parameters that is approximated by the relation 0.8ΩM-0.6ΩΛ≈-0.2±0.1 in the region of interest (ΩM
1.5). For a flat (ΩM+ΩΛ=1) cosmology we find ΩMflat=0.28+0.09-0.08 (1 σ statistical) +0.05-0.04 (identified systematics). The data are strongly inconsistent with a Λ=0 flat cosmology, the simplest inflationary universe model. An open, Λ=0 cosmology also does not fit the data well: the data indicate that the cosmological constant is nonzero and positive, with a confidence of P(Λ>0)=99%, including the identified systematic uncertainties. The best-fit age of the universe relative to the Hubble time is t0flat=14.9+1.4-1.1(0.63/h) Gyr for a flat cosmology. The size of our sample allows us to perform a variety of statistical tests to check for possible systematic errors and biases. We find no significant differences in either the host reddening distribution or Malmquist bias between the low-redshift Calán/Tololo sample and our high-redshift sample. Excluding those few supernovae that are outliers in color excess or fit residual does not significantly change the results. The conclusions are also robust whether or not a width-luminosity relation is used to standardize the supernova peak magnitudes. We discuss and constrain, where possible, hypothetical alternatives to a cosmological constant.
cosmology: observations; distance scale; supernovae: general
Issue 2 (1999 June 1)
Received 1998 September 8, accepted for publication 1998 December 17
S. Perlmutter et al. 1999 ApJ 517 565
John L. Tonry and Marijn Franx 1999 ApJ 515 512
Julio F. Navarro et al. 1997 ApJ 490 493
Myeong-Gu Park and J. Richard Gott III 1997 ApJ 489 476
J. Richard Gott III et al. 2001 ApJ 549 1
Max Tegmark et al. 1997 ApJ 480 22
Limin Wang et al. 2000 ApJ 530 17
Takashi Nakamura and Takeshi Chiba 2001 ApJ 550 1
Christian Krekeler and Luigi Delle Site 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 192101
Matej Praprotnik et al 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F281
TeV measured with the ATLAS detector